Loading benchmark catalogue
Compare performance benchmarks, coding intelligence, reasoning evaluations, context limits, and API economics between Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Ling 3.1 Flash (InclusionAI).
| Metric / Capability | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer / Organization | Anthropic | InclusionAI |
| Release Date | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-02 |
| Deployment / Weights | Proprietary Cloud API | Proprietary Cloud API |
| Context Window | 1M tokens (1,000,000 tokens) | 262K tokens (262,144 tokens) |
| Input Pricing (/1M Tokens) | $0.1 | $0.075 |
| Output Pricing (/1M Tokens) | $0.5 | $0.225 |
| Benchmark / Domain | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.1 Flash | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Composite index aggregating 10+ evaluations of general reasoning and knowledge. | 43.4% | 41.1% | Claude Haiku 5.5 (+6%) |
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 Composite index of coding-agent systems (model + harness) across FrontierCode v1.1, SWE-Atlas-QnA, and Terminal-Bench v4. | 37.3% | — | — |
SWE-bench Pro Harder, contamination-resistant successor to SWE-bench spanning multiple languages. | — | 68.7% | — |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 Sandboxed command-line tasks requiring shell and file-system operation. | 39.2% | 46.0% | Ling 3.1 Flash (+17%) |
ARC-AGI-2 Novel visual grid puzzles requiring abstract rule induction. | 61.3% | — | — |
Humanity's Last Exam Expert-written questions across hundreds of disciplines designed to resist saturation. | 45.9% | 37.4% | Claude Haiku 5.5 (+23%) |
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) Unpublished, research-level mathematics problems across Tiers 1-3. | 75.1% | — | — |
Design Arena ELO Human-preference ELO across UI, 3D, data-visualization, and game-dev generations. | 1344 | — | — |
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads across 2 evaluated benchmarks compared to 1 for Ling 3.1 Flash, showing notable advantages in Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Humanity's Last Exam.
Claude Haiku 5.5 offers a larger context capacity of 1M tokens (1,000,000 tokens), compared to 262K tokens for Ling 3.1 Flash.
Ling 3.1 Flash is more economical. Input tokens cost $0.075/M tokens compared to $0.1/M tokens for Claude Haiku 5.5.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is a proprietary cloud API. Ling 3.1 Flash is a proprietary cloud API.
Analyze 130+ models side-by-side using interactive radar charts, cost-efficiency quadrant plots, and live dataset filters on the full NeuBench index.
Open Interactive Comparator